2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

11/23/2014: Using AZUL 7 instead of OpenJDK Java for smaller Docker images.

Witness a tale of two Dockerfiles that perform the same task. See the size difference. Imagine how it might change infrastructure costs.

DOCKERFILE ONE


FROM debian:wheezy

RUN apt-get update && apt-get install -y openjdk-7-jre && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*

ADD target/si-standalone-sample-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar /

ENV JAVA_HOME /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64
ENV CLASSPATH si-standalone-sample-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar

CMD [ "java", "org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher" ]


DOCKERFILE TWO


FROM debian:wheezy

RUN apt-key adv --keyserver hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com:80 --recv-keys 0x219BD9C9 && \
  echo "deb http://repos.azulsystems.com/ubuntu precise main" >> /etc/apt/sources.list.d/zulu.list && \
  apt-get -qq update && \
  apt-get -qqy install zulu-7 && \
  rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/*

ADD target/si-standalone-sample-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar /

ENV JAVA_HOME /usr/lib/jvm/zulu-7-amd64
ENV CLASSPATH si-standalone-sample-1.0-SNAPSHOT.jar

CMD [ "java", "org.springframework.boot.loader.JarLauncher" ]

Notice the only difference is which Java is being installed. Here are the image sizes:

spring-integration   openjdk  549.1 MB
spring-integration   azul     261.3 MB

That's a 288MB difference.



subscribe via RSS